Forum | Sensible Gun Legislation Plan!

You must be logged in to post

Search Forums:


 






Sensible Gun Legislation Plan!

UserPost

5:56 pm
March 11, 2010


OutdoorFrontiers

Whitlock, TN

Admin

posts 1440

1

Well, it makes perfect sense.  If I phone in a home invasion, the police can take their time and just dispatch the crime scene unit, because it'll all be done, there's no emergency any more…

But if someone doesn't have any means to defend themselves and their property, then an emergency response is needed.  Those cost more in manpower and equipment…

Steve Huber Editor in Chief/Executive Producer OutdoorFrontiers Multi-Media

3:06 pm
March 11, 2010


lilmule

Buchanan,Tn

Member

posts 1447

2

Kinda like the reverse anti gun puts out,lol make them pay for it for a change.

12:58 pm
March 10, 2010


OutdoorFrontiers

Whitlock, TN

Admin

posts 1440

3

Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont's own Constitution very carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.

Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun.

Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only affirming the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear mandate to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals. Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent."

Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise."

Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so,"

Maslack says Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least restrictive laws of any state .. it's currently the only state that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit. This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation.

"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."

This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns. Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.  I like it!  Cool

Steve Huber Editor in Chief/Executive Producer OutdoorFrontiers Multi-Media



About the Outdoor Frontiers forum

Most Users Ever Online:

18


Currently Online:

10 Guests

Forum Stats:

Groups: 6

Forums: 20

Topics: 686

Posts: 3846

Membership:

There are 246 Members

There has been 1 Guest

There are 2 Admins

There are 0 Moderators

Top Posters:

lilmule – 1447

dougw – 607

andyfender – 84

tndiver – 70

transamz9 – 33

Chris2fur – 27

Administrators: OutdoorFrontiers (1440 Posts), siteadmin (15 Posts)